Lease Portfolio Intelligence reads every lease in the portfolio and surfaces what is currently being taken on trust: each option window and its dates, every rent review trigger, the make-good and outgoings obligations, and what each managing agent has and has not actioned.
For owners, directors and CFOs of private property groups. Your data stays in Australia.
Managing agents administer the leases day to day. The owner sees a rent roll and a set of invoices. Between the lease and the summary sits a set of dated obligations that nobody independently checks against the document itself.
An option to renew has a window. It opens and closes on dates set by the lease, often months before expiry. A window missed is a tenancy lost or a rent reset on the landlord's terms instead of yours.
A market review has to be initiated by a date. If the trigger passes without a notice, the review is forgone for the period. The rent roll will not tell you a review was available and not taken.
Make-good obligations fall due at expiry. Outgoings recoveries are defined by the lease, not by whatever the invoice says. CPI increases apply on an anniversary. Each is a clause with a date attached.
The system reads the lease, then reads the record of what was sent and when, and shows where the two do not line up. It does not accuse anyone. It shows you what is currently unverified.
Every obligation the system surfaces carries a reference to the lease and the page it came from. Your people verify against the source, not against a confidence score.
Every option window, rent review trigger, CPI date, make-good and outgoings obligation across the portfolio, each with the lease, the clause and the dates it runs between.
Page-referenced to the source leaseThe dated obligations ordered by what falls next, so the windows about to open or close are visible before they pass rather than after.
Updated as new leases are onboardedWhere the record of what the agent sent does not match what the lease requires, flagged for your review. The system drafts the question; your people decide.
Uncertain reads are marked uncertainMost AI tools flatten documents into text and hope the meaning survived. Tables become paragraphs. The clause number detaches from the clause. The chain back to the source page disappears, replaced by a confidence score.
That is acceptable for a chatbot. It is not acceptable for an option deadline, a payment claim, or anything a lawyer or adjudicator might one day read.
Every Lumen & Lever system is built on Sourcetrace, our document-structure engine. It preserves layout, tables, annotations and page evidence before anything reaches a model, so every claim the system makes carries a reference to the page it came from.
The controls are not a product we sell you. They come fitted as standard.
Every output cites its source document and page. No orphan facts.
Your environment or private Australian hosting. No training on your data. No offshore routing.
Named human review points before any output is relied on. The system drafts; your people decide.
A log of what the system read, produced and flagged, kept for the life of the engagement.
Uncertain extractions are marked uncertain. Confidence is reported, not performed.
Thirty minutes. You describe the documents and where you suspect leakage. We tell you which lane fits and whether a Proof Week is worth your money. Sometimes it is not, and we say so.
We sign your NDA, take a sample of documents, and build. Five days later you watch the system run on your own record.
Production build, or a findings register and a handshake. No retainer, no lock-in, no deck.
Or write direct: hello@lumenandlever.com · Melbourne, Australia